Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLi, D
dc.contributor.authorDong, X
dc.contributor.authorBorthwick, AGL
dc.contributor.authorSharma, S
dc.contributor.authorWang, T
dc.contributor.authorHuang, H
dc.contributor.authorShi, H
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-01T16:09:44Z
dc.date.available2024-05-01T16:09:44Z
dc.date.issued2024-06
dc.identifier.issn0360-5442
dc.identifier.issn1873-6785
dc.identifier.other131219
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/22426
dc.description.abstract

A numerical model of two-buoy and single-buoy floating wave energy converters (WECs) is developed based on a modified nonlinear version of WEC-Sim. The model is validated against experimental data from a 1:5 geometric scale model of a two-buoy floating WEC. Nonlinear behavior is primarily attributed to viscous damping and mechanical friction effects. It is found that a modified version of WEC-Sim obtained by correcting the phase of the wave excitation force in the source code provides an accurate representation of a two-buoy WEC operating in either linear or nonlinear mode. An equivalent single-buoy WEC is modeled by locking the two-buoys together. The two-buoy WEC exhibits more than double the predicted maximum energy capture efficiency than its single-buoy counterpart within the range of numerical tests considered. Simulations of idealized floating WECs in conditions representative of Zhaitang Island, China indicate that the maximum energy capture efficiency may be enhanced by 13 % when using a two-buoy system instead of a single-buoy WEC. The findings should be useful to practitioners involved in the design of floating wave energy converters.

dc.format.extent131219-131219
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.subject4015 Maritime Engineering
dc.subject40 Engineering
dc.subject7 Affordable and Clean Energy
dc.titleTwo-buoy and single-buoy floating wave energy converters: A numerical comparison
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.volume296
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.131219
plymouth.publication-statusAccepted
plymouth.journalEnergy
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.energy.2024.131219
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Science and Engineering|School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups|Marine Institute
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Current Academic staff
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA|UoA12 Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2029 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2029 Researchers by UoA|UoA12 Engineering
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-04-04
dc.date.updated2024-05-01T16:09:44Z
dc.rights.embargodate2025-4-5
dc.identifier.eissn1873-6785
dc.rights.embargoperiod
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.energy.2024.131219


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV