Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLopez, C
dc.contributor.authorYacine Haddoud, M
dc.contributor.authorKasturiratne, D
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-01T12:48:45Z
dc.date.available2022-07-01T12:48:45Z
dc.date.issued2022-10
dc.identifier.issn0148-2963
dc.identifier.issn1873-7978
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/19371
dc.description.abstract

Findings on the innovation–export entry nexus remain inconclusive, which may be attributable to methodological issues. Most research has focused on the separate effects of single predictors and has investigated only one or two types of innovation. However, firms’ exporting behavior is complex, and is likely to be determined by interactions between innovation types. Drawing on resource orchestration theory, we adopt a configuration approach to uncover combinations of innovation types (considered here as resources) associated with exporting, rather than investigating them in isolation. The study incorporates four types of innovation: product, process, organizational and marketing innovation. The findings from a sample of Spanish companies show that combinations involving product and process innovation, or product and marketing innovation make a more compelling case for export entry. The results have theoretical and managerial implications that progress thinking in this area and reconcile current literature on the innovation–export nexus.

dc.format.extent927-937
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectInnovation
dc.subjectExport propensity
dc.subjectInternationalization
dc.subjectConfiguration approach
dc.subjectQualitative comparative analysis (QCA)
dc.titleRevisiting the innovation–export entry link through a configuration approach
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000813036000031&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.volume149
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.018
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Business Research
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.018
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business/Plymouth Business School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-05-09
dc.rights.embargodate2022-7-2
dc.identifier.eissn1873-7978
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.018
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV