Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAirody, A
dc.contributor.authorBaseler, HA
dc.contributor.authorSeymour, J
dc.contributor.authorAllgar, V
dc.contributor.authorMukherjee, R
dc.contributor.authorDowney, L
dc.contributor.authorDhar-Munshi, S
dc.contributor.authorMahmood, S
dc.contributor.authorBalaskas, K
dc.contributor.authorEmpeslidis, T
dc.contributor.authorHanson, RLW
dc.contributor.authorDorey, T
dc.contributor.authorSzczerbicki, T
dc.contributor.authorSivaprasad, S
dc.contributor.authorGale, RP
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-11T13:28:26Z
dc.date.available2023-10-11T13:28:26Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2055-5784
dc.identifier.issn2055-5784
dc.identifier.other63
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/21377
dc.description.abstract

Background/objectives In healthcare research investigating complex interventions, gaps in understanding of processes can be filled by using qualitative methods alongside a quantitative approach. The aim of this mixed-methods pilot trial was to provide feasibility evidence comparing two treatment regimens for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) to inform a future large-scale randomised controlled trial (RCT). Subjects/methods Forty-four treatment-naïve nAMD patients were followed over 24 months and randomised to one of two treatment regimens: standard care (SC) or treat and extend (T&E). The primary objective evaluated feasibility of the MATE trial via evaluations of screening logs for recruitment rates, nonparticipation and screen fails, whilst qualitative in-depth interviews with key study staff evaluated the recruitment phase and running of the trial. The secondary objective assessed changes in visual acuity and central retinal thickness (CRT) between the two treatment arms. Results The overall recruitment rate was 3.07 participants per month with a 40.8% non-participation rate, 18.51% screen-failure rate and 15% withdrawal/non-completion rate. Key themes in the recruitment phase included human factors, protocol-related issues, recruitment processes and challenges. Both treatment regimens showed a trend towards a visual acuity gain at month 12 which was not maintained at month 24, whilst CRT reduced similarly in both regimens over the same time period. These were achieved with one less treatment following a T&E regimen. Conclusion This mixed-methodology, pilot RCT achieved its pre-defined recruitment, nonparticipation and screen failure rates, thus deeming it a success. With some minor protocol amendments, progression to a large-scale RCT will be achievable.

dc.format.extent63-
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.subjectPilot
dc.subjectRandomised controlled trial
dc.subjectMixed methodology
dc.subjectNeovascular age-related macular degeneration
dc.titleThe MATE trial: a multicentre, mixed-methodology, pilot, randomised controlled trial in neovascular age-related macular degeneration
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37081576
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume9
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01288-0
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalPilot and Feasibility Studies
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40814-023-01288-0
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Academics
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health|Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups|Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-03-30
dc.date.updated2023-10-11T13:28:26Z
dc.rights.embargodate2023-10-14
dc.identifier.eissn2055-5784
dc.rights.embargoperiodforever
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s40814-023-01288-0


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV