Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGridley, K
dc.contributor.authorDixon, J
dc.contributor.authorHicks, B
dc.contributor.authorBirks, Y
dc.contributor.authorBaxter, K
dc.contributor.authorMiles, E
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, L
dc.contributor.authorPerach, R
dc.contributor.authorBanerjee, S
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-01T10:21:09Z
dc.date.available2023-11-01T10:21:09Z
dc.date.issued2023-11
dc.identifier.issn1471-3012
dc.identifier.issn1741-2684
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/21500
dc.description.abstract

<jats:p> There is a notable lack of evidence on what constitutes good practice in remote quantitative data collection from research participants with dementia. During the COVID-19 pandemic face-to-face research became problematic, especially where participants were older and more at risk of infection. The DETERMIND-C19 study, a large cohort study of people with dementia, switched to telephone data collection over this period. This paper explores the experiences of researchers who collected quantitative data over the telephone from people with dementia during the first COVID-19 lockdowns in England. The aim was to learn from these experiences, share insights and inform future research practice across disciplines. Seven DETERMIND researchers were interviewed about the processes and challenges of collecting quantitative data from people with dementia over the telephone compared to face-to-face. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Two themes were developed: first the telephone adds an extra layer of confusion to an already cognitively complex interaction. Second, researchers found it difficult to recognise subtle cues that signalled participants’ rising emotion over the telephone in time to prevent distress. The researchers employed strategies to support participants which may not have conformed to the strict conventions of structured interviewing, but which were informed by person-oriented principles. Whilst in practice this may be a common approach to balancing the needs of participants and the requirements of quantitative research, it is rare for studies to openly discuss such trade-offs in the literature. Honest, reflective reporting is required if the practice of remote data collection from people with dementia is to progress ethically and with integrity. </jats:p>

dc.format.extent1718-1737
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.subjectdementia
dc.subjectdata collection
dc.subjectstandardised measures
dc.subjecttelephone interviews
dc.subjectperson-oriented
dc.titleStandardised data collection from people with dementia over the telephone: A qualitative study of the experience of DETERMIND programme researchers in a pandemic
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37495232
plymouth.issue8
plymouth.volume22
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14713012231190585
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalDementia
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/14713012231190585
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|PS - Office of Vice Chancellor
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Academics
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA|UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health|Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Researchers in ResearchFish submission
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health|Peninsula Medical School|PMS - Manual
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dc.date.updated2023-11-01T10:21:08Z
dc.identifier.eissn1741-2684
dc.rights.embargoperiodforever
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1177/14713012231190585


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV