Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWinters, E
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, W
dc.contributor.authorJeremy, K
dc.contributor.authorSubhan, M
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-08T15:02:40Z
dc.date.available2024-01-08T15:02:40Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-08
dc.identifier.issn2504-284X
dc.identifier.issn2504-284X
dc.identifier.otherARTN 1321206
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/21883
dc.description.abstract

Introduction: Online examinations are becoming increasingly incorporated into higher education. However, Biomedical Science students’ perspectives on exam format preferences remains unexplored. This study aims to investigate exam format preferences and attitudes of these students.

Methods: A self-reported survey of 31 questions on online exam perceptions was utilized and composed of six dimensions: affective factors, validity, practicality, reliability, security, and pedagogy. Scores measured student attitudes around online exams. Additionally, categorical questions examined attitudes around open-book online exams (OBOEs), closed-book online exams (CBOEs), and paper-based exams (PBEs). Qualitative analysis was conducted via the use of open-ended questions and a focus group on five participants. The questionnaire was distributed to undergraduates and 146 students responded across six different programmes.

Results: The findings revealed that 57.5% of students preferred OBOEs while only 19.9% preferred PBEs. OBOEs were perceived as more favorable in all six dimensions and superior in terms of reducing stress, ensuring fairness, allowing demonstration of understanding, and retaining information. Gender had no statistically significant influence on perception. However, programme statistically significantly affected responses. Qualitative data supported the main statistical analysis and identified a trade-off between the ability to retain information with PBEs, despite the stress and better demonstration of understanding with OBOEs.

Discussion: Overall, OBOEs were viewed positively and were well accepted; they are anticipated to be a dominant examination format at the UoP. Institutions wishing to implement online exams should consider the perceived benefits they have over traditional exams. These findings contribute to the understanding of students’ perceptions of exam formats, which can inform their design and application in higher education. Further research should explore the perceptions of other disciplines and identify ways to address any challenges associated with online exams.

dc.format.extent1321206-
dc.publisherFrontiers Media
dc.subjectbiomedical science
dc.subjectexaminations
dc.subjectfocus group
dc.subjectquestionnaire
dc.subjectassessment
dc.subjectonline exams
dc.subjectpaper-based exams
dc.titleComparison of biomedical science students’ perceptions of online versus paper-based examinations
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.volume8
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalFrontiers in Education
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/feduc.2023.1321206
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Academics
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health|School of Biomedical Sciences
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-12-08
dc.date.updated2024-01-08T15:02:40Z
dc.rights.embargodate2024-1-10
dc.identifier.eissn2504-284X
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3389/feduc.2023.1321206


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV