Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWatson, SCL
dc.contributor.authorSomerfield, PJ
dc.contributor.authorLemasson, AJ
dc.contributor.authorKnights, AM
dc.contributor.authorEdwards-Jones, A
dc.contributor.authorNunes, J
dc.contributor.authorPascoe, C
dc.contributor.authorMcNeill, CL
dc.contributor.authorSchratzberger, M
dc.contributor.authorThompson, MSA
dc.contributor.authorCouce, E
dc.contributor.authorSzostek, CL
dc.contributor.authorBaxter, H
dc.contributor.authorBeaumont, NJ
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-12T11:44:14Z
dc.date.available2024-03-12T11:44:14Z
dc.date.issued2024-03
dc.identifier.issn1873-524X
dc.identifier.issn1873-524X
dc.identifier.other107023
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/22171
dc.description.abstract

Understanding the global impact of offshore wind farms (OWF) on biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES) is crucial in developing sustainable energy transition pathways. This study takes a holistic approach, coupling a semi-systematic review with a novel analytical methodology, to consider the consequences of construction & operation of OWF deployment on biodiversity and ES. 314 pieces of evidence taken from 132 peer-reviewed studies provide the basis to determine the ecological and ES impacts. The process showed that construction impacts were predominantly negative across the ecological subject groups (52%), compared with positive impacts (8%) with several species of fish (e.g. brill, cod, dab, plaice) and some species of birds (e.g. common guillemot, northern fulmar, redhead) showing strongly negative trends. Operational phase impacts were more variable and could be either negative (32%) or positive (34%) depending on site specific conditions. More detailed investigations into fish, shellfish, humans and air-surface studies recorded a net positive effect of wind farm operations on these subject groups. Translation into ES outcomes identified that 14 ES are impacted by the construction and operation of OWF. The most substantially enhanced ES included effects on commercial fisheries and experiential recreation. Social acceptance toward new and hypothetical OWF was also strongly positive, irrespective of country location. Negative effects on ES, including existence values for culturally important groups, e.g., marine mammals and birds and the spread of non-native species, are potentially of most significance. Overall, this study finds more than 86% of possible offshore wind farm impacts on ES are still unknown. There was also a paucity of studies on the decommissioning of OWF and the impacts of deeper-water floating structures, with a bias in studies toward northern hemisphere and developed countries.

dc.format.extent107023-107023
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectRenewable energy
dc.subjectOffshore-wind farms
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subjectBiodiversity net gain
dc.subjectEcosystem services
dc.titleThe global impact of offshore wind farms on ecosystem services
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeReview
plymouth.volume249
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107023
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalOcean and Coastal Management
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107023
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Science and Engineering|School of Biological and Marine Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Academics
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA|UoA07 Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Researchers in ResearchFish submission
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2029 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2029 Researchers by UoA|UoA07 Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Former Academic staff
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-01-10
dc.date.updated2024-03-12T11:44:12Z
dc.rights.embargodate2024-3-13
dc.identifier.eissn1873-524X
dc.rights.embargoperiodforever
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107023


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV