Where next for the design, delivery, and evaluation of community-based physical activity prescription? Emerging lessons from the United Kingdom
dc.contributor.author | Oliver, EJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Buckley, B | |
dc.contributor.author | Dodd-Reynolds, CJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Downey, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Hanson, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Henderson, H | |
dc.contributor.author | Hawkins, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Steele, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Wade, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Watson, PM | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-01T12:07:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-01T12:07:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-11 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1715-5312 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1715-5320 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/22416 | |
dc.description.abstract |
<jats:p> Despite widespread use, community-based physical activity prescription is controversial. Data limitations have resulted in a lack of clarity about what works, under what circumstances, and for whom, reflected in conservative policy recommendations. In this commentary we challenge a predominantly negative discourse, using contemporary research to highlight promising findings and “lessons learnt” for design, delivery, and evaluation. In doing so, we argue for the importance of a more nuanced approach to future commissioning and evaluation. </jats:p><jats:p> Novelty: Amalgamating learning from multiple research teams to create recommendations for advancing physical activity prescription. </jats:p> | |
dc.format.extent | 1430-1434 | |
dc.format.medium | Print-Electronic | |
dc.language | en | |
dc.publisher | Canadian Science Publishing | |
dc.subject | exercise | |
dc.subject | referral | |
dc.subject | public health | |
dc.subject | prescribing | |
dc.subject | recommendations | |
dc.title | Where next for the design, delivery, and evaluation of community-based physical activity prescription? Emerging lessons from the United Kingdom | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
plymouth.author-url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34324824 | |
plymouth.issue | 11 | |
plymouth.volume | 46 | |
plymouth.publication-status | Published | |
plymouth.journal | Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1139/apnm-2021-0101 | |
plymouth.organisational-group | |Plymouth | |
plymouth.organisational-group | |Plymouth|Faculty of Health | |
plymouth.organisational-group | |Plymouth|Faculty of Health|School of Nursing and Midwifery | |
plymouth.organisational-group | |Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA | |
plymouth.organisational-group | |Plymouth|Users by role | |
plymouth.organisational-group | |Plymouth|Users by role|Current Academic staff | |
plymouth.organisational-group | |Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA|UoA20 Social Work and Social Policy | |
plymouth.organisational-group | |Plymouth|REF 2029 Researchers by UoA | |
plymouth.organisational-group | |Plymouth|REF 2029 Researchers by UoA|UoA20 Social Work and Social Policy | |
dc.publisher.place | Canada | |
dc.date.updated | 2024-05-01T12:07:25Z | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1715-5320 | |
dc.rights.embargoperiod | forever | |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.1139/apnm-2021-0101 |