Two-buoy and single-buoy floating wave energy converters: A numerical comparison
dc.contributor.author | Li, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Dong, X | |
dc.contributor.author | Borthwick, AGL | |
dc.contributor.author | Sharma, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Huang, H | |
dc.contributor.author | Shi, H | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-01T16:09:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-01T16:09:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-06 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0360-5442 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1873-6785 | |
dc.identifier.other | 131219 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/22426 | |
dc.description.abstract |
A numerical model of two-buoy and single-buoy floating wave energy converters (WECs) is developed based on a modified nonlinear version of WEC-Sim. The model is validated against experimental data from a 1:5 geometric scale model of a two-buoy floating WEC. Nonlinear behavior is primarily attributed to viscous damping and mechanical friction effects. It is found that a modified version of WEC-Sim obtained by correcting the phase of the wave excitation force in the source code provides an accurate representation of a two-buoy WEC operating in either linear or nonlinear mode. An equivalent single-buoy WEC is modeled by locking the two-buoys together. The two-buoy WEC exhibits more than double the predicted maximum energy capture efficiency than its single-buoy counterpart within the range of numerical tests considered. Simulations of idealized floating WECs in conditions representative of Zhaitang Island, China indicate that the maximum energy capture efficiency may be enhanced by 13 % when using a two-buoy system instead of a single-buoy WEC. The findings should be useful to practitioners involved in the design of floating wave energy converters. | |
dc.format.extent | 131219-131219 | |
dc.language | en | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier BV | |
dc.subject | 4015 Maritime Engineering | |
dc.subject | 40 Engineering | |
dc.subject | 7 Affordable and Clean Energy | |
dc.title | Two-buoy and single-buoy floating wave energy converters: A numerical comparison | |
dc.type | journal-article | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
plymouth.volume | 296 | |
plymouth.publisher-url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.131219 | |
plymouth.publication-status | Accepted | |
plymouth.journal | Energy | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.energy.2024.131219 | |
plymouth.organisational-group | |Plymouth | |
plymouth.organisational-group | |Plymouth|Research Groups | |
plymouth.organisational-group | |Plymouth|Faculty of Science and Engineering | |
plymouth.organisational-group | |Plymouth|Faculty of Science and Engineering|School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics | |
plymouth.organisational-group | |Plymouth|Research Groups|Marine Institute | |
plymouth.organisational-group | |Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA | |
plymouth.organisational-group | |Plymouth|Users by role | |
plymouth.organisational-group | |Plymouth|Users by role|Current Academic staff | |
plymouth.organisational-group | |Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA|UoA12 Engineering | |
plymouth.organisational-group | |Plymouth|REF 2029 Researchers by UoA | |
plymouth.organisational-group | |Plymouth|REF 2029 Researchers by UoA|UoA12 Engineering | |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2024-04-04 | |
dc.date.updated | 2024-05-01T16:09:44Z | |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2025-4-5 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1873-6785 | |
dc.rights.embargoperiod | ||
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.1016/j.energy.2024.131219 |