Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPowell, N
dc.contributor.authorUpton, M
dc.contributor.authorKent, B
dc.contributor.authorSandoe, J
dc.contributor.authorTonkin-Crine, S
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-07T18:58:30Z
dc.date.available2024-05-07T18:58:30Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-28
dc.identifier.issn2632-1823
dc.identifier.issn2632-1823
dc.identifier.otherARTN dlae020
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/22467
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>Non-allergist-delivered penicillin allergy de-labelling (PADL) is supported by UK and other national guidelines but is not yet routine practice in UK hospitals. Those who have undergone PADL report high rates of acceptance, but it is unknown why some continue to avoid penicillin, and why some decline testing.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Objectives</jats:title> <jats:p>To explore the experiences of patients recently approached for penicillin allergy (penA) assessment and de-label by non-allergists in a UK hospital to determine the barriers and enablers to patient acceptance of PADL.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with patients who were penA assessed and de-labelled during an inpatient stay between November 2022 and January 2023. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Nineteen patients were interviewed. Patients were largely unaware of the negative impact of penA on their healthcare. Patients had differing views on challenging their penA status while they were acutely unwell, some agreeing that it is the right time to test and others not. Patients declined testing because they felt they were at higher potential risk because they were older or had multiple comorbidities. Some patients who declined testing felt they would have been persuaded if they had received a better explanation of the risks and benefits of PADL.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>Patients who were successfully de-labelled were positive about the experience. Those who declined testing did so for a variety of reasons including frailty/comorbidities or a fear of testing whilst unwell. Patients highlighted the importance of good communication about the personalized risks and benefits of testing.</jats:p> </jats:sec>

dc.format.extentdlae020-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-eCollection
dc.languageen
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)
dc.subject3214 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences
dc.subject3207 Medical Microbiology
dc.subject32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
dc.subject3202 Clinical Sciences
dc.subjectHealth Services
dc.subjectClinical Research
dc.subject7.1 Individual care needs
dc.subject7 Management of diseases and conditions
dc.subject8.1 Organisation and delivery of services
dc.subject8 Health and social care services research
dc.subjectCancer
dc.titleExperiences of an inpatient penicillin allergy de-labelling pathway: capturing the patient voice
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38343626
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume6
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jacamr/dlae020
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health|School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups|Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups|Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups|Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)|CBR
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Current Academic staff
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA|UoA01 Clinical Medicine
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA|UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health|School of Biomedical Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Researchers in ResearchFish submission
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups|Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2029 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2029 Researchers by UoA|UoA01 Clinical Medicine
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2029 Researchers by UoA|UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-01-28
dc.date.updated2024-05-07T18:58:29Z
dc.identifier.eissn2632-1823
dc.rights.embargoperiodforever
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1093/jacamr/dlae020


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV